Drawing for SYSTEMGRAPHER

USPTO serial 76509456

SYSTEMGRAPHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEMGRAPHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric G. Wright

DOCKET ADMINSTRATOR MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for generating tree diagrams for use in the fields of physics, mathematics and computer science, namely the aforementioned generating tree diagrams function of the computer software is a user interface for object data access and the manipulation of objects of a simulation and their interdependencies allowing the user to access, manipulate or create objects and their interdependenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 12, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 6, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance