USPTO serial 76509745
TOREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3805126Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, SYNTHETIC LEATHER PIECE GOODS, AND ARTICLES MADE FROM THESE MATERIALS, NAMELY, PURSES; TRUNKS, TRAVELING BAGS, HAND BAGS AND SHOULDER BAGS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS, HARNESSES, SADDLERY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | ROPES, TWINES, STRINGS, TENTS, AWNINGS OF FABRIC, CANVAS TARPAULINS, SAILS, SACKS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OR STORAGE OF MATERIALS IN BULK AND FISHING NETS; PADDING MATERIALS AND STUFFING MATERIALS NOT OF RUBBER, PAPER OR PLASTIC FOR CUSHION, PILLOW, QUILT OR MATTRESS; RAW FIBROUS TEXTILE MATERIALS, SHORT YARN FIBERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 023 | YARNS AND THREADS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | BED SHEETS AND TABLE COVERS, NAMELY, TABLE RUNNERS AND TABLE LINENS; TEXTILE ARTICLES, NAMELY, TOWELS OF TEXTILE, CURTAINS, PILLOW CASES, QUILTS, MOSQUITO NETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, PANTS, COATS, JACKETS, JERSEYS, JUMPERS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, SWIMSUITS, BATHING SUITS, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, HOSIERY, SHOES, HAT, CAP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
- Other trademarks owned by Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
- Other trademarks owned by Toray Kabushiki Kaisha (Toray Industries, Inc.)
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named TOREX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 23, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |