USPTO serial 76509808
YUMI ETO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YUMI ETO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver BCV6B 2X1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J PATCH
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys; jewelry; precious gemstones; and horological and chronometric instruments, namely, watches and clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk; animal skins; leatherwares, namely, purses, wallets; trunks and traveling bags; backpacks; handbags; leather, cloth, vinyl and mesh shopping bags and wheeled shopping bags; all purpose bags for climbers; all purpose bags for campers; beach bags; school bags; pocket wallets; briefcases; purses not of precious metal; leather traveling sets comprised of luggage; satchels; vanity cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, dresses, shirts, pants, shorts, belts, ties, waistcoats,jerseys, sweaters, trousers, skirts, wedding dresses, gowns, jackets, coats, knit tops and bottoms, blouses, woven tops and bottoms, and suits; separates, namely, sweaters, cardigans, tank tops, tube tops, halter tops and bustiers, evening dresses, tuxedos, scarves, and wraps; camisoles, bras, panties, underwear, underpants, undergarments, underclothes, teddies, slips, negligees, lingerie, foundation garments, girdles, corsets, body slips, body suits, sleepwear, pajamas, dressing gowns and nightgowns; leather coats and jackets, anoraks, evening coats and jackets, rainwear, caps, bandanas, sweatshirts, socks, stockings, bathing suits, caps and trunks, footwear and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |