Drawing for ITVRATINGS.COM

USPTO serial 76509855

ITVRATINGS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3043210Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ITVRATINGS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Polling services via the Internet, namely, television and radio audience rating servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 3, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2004NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance