Drawing for WHAT WOULD YOU SAY...IF...?

USPTO serial 76510044

WHAT WOULD YOU SAY...IF...?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHAT WOULD YOU SAY...IF...??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ED M. ROSENTSTEEL

ED M ROSENTSTEEL ROSTENSTELL & BECKMAN90 PARK AVESTE 1710NEW YORK, NY 10016-1301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Series of non-fiction books related to life experiences; and magazines featuring articles related to life experiencesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 24, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance