Drawing for DON'T COPY. LEAD.

USPTO serial 76510082

DON'T COPY. LEAD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DON'T COPY. LEAD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Mizer

SUSAN L MIZER TUCKER, ELLIS & WEST LLP1150 HUNTINGTON BLDG925 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009copier, printer, fax machine and multi-function computer peripherals parts and accessories, namely, printer cables, server and internet connectors, adapters, electrical surge protectors, data transfer switch boxes, local area network devices for coupling multiple computers in networks, computer cables and electrical connectors for such computer cables; computer hardware, namely, computer servers and computer servers with preloaded software; and multifunction computer peripheralsACTIVE—
016supplies for copiers, computer printers and fax machines, namely, computer paper, computer printer ribbons and computer ribbonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 13, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance