USPTO serial 76510194
VISIALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VISIALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Provo
JOHN W PROVO MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN & BRAND, LLP90 S SEVENTH ST3300 WLS FARGO CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services, namely, strategic needs assessment, business case development, business project consulting, business process transformation, change management, operationalization, and quality assurance consulting and training services in the field of business management consulting services, namely, strategic needs assessment, business case development, business project consulting, business process transformation, change management, operationalization | ACTIVE | Apr 28, 2003 |
| 041 | Training services, namely, training business managers on how to manage business projects using computer | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Computer information technology project management services for businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2004 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |