Drawing for SPIRITUALITY FOR KIDS

USPTO serial 76510464

SPIRITUALITY FOR KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIRITUALITY FOR KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Cox

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CD's, DVD's, audio cassettes, videotapes and record albums featuring music, religion and spirituality; holders for CDs and tapes, namely, compact discs, audio and videotape casesACTIVE—
016Series of books, magazines and newsletters featuring religion and spirituality, coloring books, mounted and unmounted photographs, posters, postcards, calendars, and greeting cardsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing seminars and courses of instruction on religion and spiritualityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 22, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 19, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 19, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 13, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance