Drawing for DEL PACIFICO

USPTO serial 76510735

DEL PACIFICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DEL PACIFICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S. Sloane

PETER S SLOANE OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029frozen seafood and fish for food purposesABANDONEDApr 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 9, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 9, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 9, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 28, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance