Drawing for RASNA BOLLYWOOD

USPTO serial 76510796

RASNA BOLLYWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RASNA BOLLYWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul F. Kilmer

Paul F. Kilmer HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; potato chips and crisps; jellies and jams; pickles; soups; preserved beans; butter, chocolate nut butter, cocoa butter for food purposes, coconut butter, peanut butter; edible oils, salted foods, namely, salted meats; yogurt; crystallized fruits; pastes, namely, vegetable pastes for food, dairy-based chocolate food beverages; vegetable-based chocolate food beveragesACTIVE—
030Coffee, coffee substitute, tea, cocoa, salt; ready to eat Indian snacks made of flour and cereals, namely, pharsan and namkeens; spices, ready to eat food articles, namely, chocolate-based ready to eat food bars, cereal derived food bars; flavorings for beverages, namely, extracts used as flavoring, not essential oils, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, flavoring syrup, extracts used as flavoring not essential oils, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring ingredient or filler, food flavorings non-essential oils; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; cookies; extracts used as flavoring; chewing gum; ice cream; ketchup; sauces; non-medicated confectionery lozenges; noodles; nutmegs; pizzas; popcorn, namely, caramel popcorn, glazed popcorn, microwave popcorn, popped popcorn, processed popcorn; puddings; rice; bread rolls; sorbets; spaghetti; sugar, sugar confectionery; natural sweeteners; sweetmeats, candy; pasta, namely, vermicelli; waffles; potato flour for foodsACTIVE—
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 14, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance