USPTO serial 76511032
SWEEPEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEEPEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services; promotion of goods and services through distribution of printed or on-line advertising materials | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2003 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |