USPTO serial 76511068
LUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3009956Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia E. Johnson
Timothy H. Hiebert SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLC2 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 23BOSTON, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Non-precious metal or pewter holiday ornaments, non-precious metal or pewter wine identification charms, non-precious metal or pewter nativity sets, non-precious metal or pewter money clips, non-precious metal or pewter pill boxes, non-precious metal or pewter jewelry boxes, non-precious metal or pewter jewelry cases, non-precious metal or pewter wine coasters, all being made of non-precious metal; and figurines made of common metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Non-precious metal, pewter, sterling silver or stainless steel flatware, namely table forks, table knives, table spoons; non-precious metal, pewter, sterling silver or stainless steel serving ware, namely, serving spoons, serving forks; cake knives and butter knives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, pins, or brooches, all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; holiday ornaments and figurines all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; metal bowls, jewelry cases, jewelry boxes, napkin rings, money clips, letter openers, picture frames, trivets, place card holders, nativity sets, silver bells, piggy banks, pill boxes, bookmarks, silver letter openers, flasks and coolers for wine, ladles, sugar tongs, wine bottle cradles, wine coasters, all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; baby ware, namely drinking cups, bowls, and rattles, all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; sterling silver tableware, namely silver dinner bells, candle sticks, trays, serving bowls, sauce boats, cocktail shakers and caviar servers, namely bowls for serving caviar, and ice buckets, pie servers, coolers for wine, ice buckets, flasks, wine coasters, and wine bottle cradles; silver plated or sterling silver drinking cups | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Ladles, pasta scoops, pie servers, sugar tongs, napkin rings, trays, serving bowls, sauce boats, cocktail shakers, caviar servers, namely, bowls for serving caviar, coolers for wine, ice buckets, flasks, wine coasters, and wine bottle cradles, hollow ware trays, platters, bowls, plates, dishes, coffee pots, tea pots, tea balls tea strainers, sugar bowls, creamers, pitchers, gravy boats, candle sticks, bottle openers, cork screws, cocktail shakers, wine buckets; metal or pewter baby sets, namely cups, bowls, brushes and comb sets, and rattles; and trivets all of the above being made of non-precious metals and ceramic figurines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Baby rattles; Christmas tree ornaments, all being made of non-precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lunt Silversmiths, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lunt Silversmiths, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lunt Silversmiths, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LUNT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |