USPTO serial 76511103
LUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenfield, MA
Greenfield, MA
Greenfield, MA
BRISTOL, PA
TAUNTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Norvell
Joseph V. Norvell Norvell IP llcP.O. Box 2461Chicago, IL 60690UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Non-precious metal or pewter holiday ornaments, non-precious metal or pewter wine identification charms, non-precious metal or pewter nativity sets, non-precious metal or pewter money clips, non-precious metal or pewter pill boxes, non-precious metal or pewter jewelry boxes, non-precious metal or pewter jewelry cases, all being made of non-precious metal; and figurines made of common metals ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1936 |
| 008 | Non-precious metal, [ pewter, ] sterling silver or stainless steel flatware, namely, table forks, table knives, table spoons; non-precious metal, [ pewter, ] sterling silver or stainless steel serving ware, namely, cake knives and butter knives | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 1936 |
| 014 | [ Jewelry, pins, or brooches, all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; ] holiday ornaments [ and figurines ] all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; metal bowls, [ jewelry cases, jewelry boxes, napkin rings, money clips, letter openers, ] picture frames, [ trivets, place card holders, nativity sets, silver bells, ] piggy banks, [ pill boxes, bookmarks, silver letter openers, flasks and coolers for wine, ] ladles, [ sugar tongs, wine bottle cradles, wine coasters, ] all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; baby ware, namely, drinking cups, bowls, [ and rattles, ] all being silver plated or made of sterling silver or other precious metal; sterling silver tableware, namely, silver [ dinner bells, candle sticks, ] trays, serving bowls, [ sauce boats, cocktail shakers and caviar servers, namely, bowls for serving caviar, and ice buckets, ] pie servers; [ coolers for wine, ice buckets, flasks, wine coasters, and wine bottle cradles; ] silver plated or sterling silver drinking cups; serving spoons and serving forks made of precious metal | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 1936 |
| 021 | Ladles, [ pasta scoops, ] pie servers, [ sugar tongs, napkin rings, ] trays, serving bowls, [ sauce boats, cocktail shakers, caviar servers, namely, bowls for serving caviar, coolers for wine, ice buckets, flasks, wine coasters, and wine bottle cradles, ] hollow ware trays, platters, bowls, [ plates, dishes, coffee pots, tea pots, tea balls tea strainers, sugar bowls, creamers, pitchers, gravy boats, candle sticks, bottle openers, cork screws, cocktail shakers, wine buckets; ] metal or pewter baby sets, namely, cups, bowls, brushes and comb sets, [ and rattles; and trivets ] all of the above being made of non-precious metals; [ and ceramic figurines; ] non-precious metal serving spoons and serving forks | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 1936 |
| 028 | [ Baby rattles; Christmas tree ornaments, all being made of non-precious metal ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1936 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lunt Silversmiths, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lunt Silversmiths, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lunt Silversmiths, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LENOX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by REED AND BARTON CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LUNT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |