USPTO serial 76511145
SQUAW ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SQUAW ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Alpine Meadows, CA, US
Squaw Valley Development Company
Olympic Valley, CA, US
Squaw Valley Development Company
Olympic Valley, CA, US
Squaw Valley Development Company
Olympic Valley, CA, US
Olympic Valley, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian L. Saffer
Ian L. Saffer Quarles & Brady LLP8744 Kendrick Castillo Way, Suite 560Highlands Ranch, CO 80129United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [ men's, women's and children's ski and snowboard clothing and accessories, namely, ski jackets, ski sweaters, ski pants, ski gloves, ski head bands, ski vests, ski hats, snowboard jackets, snowboard sweaters, snowboard pants, snowboard gloves, snowboard head bands, snowboard vests, snowboard hats ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [ skis, ski poles, ski bindings, ski tuning kits comprised of waxes and adjustment tools,] [ ski equipment, namely, power cords ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | retail store services in the field of ski and snowboard sporting goods and equipment, ski and snowboard apparel for men, women and children, ski and snowboard footwear, and ski and snowboard headgear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PALISADES TAHOE RESORT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Squaw Valley Development Company
- Other trademarks owned by Squaw Valley Development Company
- Other trademarks owned by Squaw Valley Development Company
- Other trademarks owned by SQUAW VALLEY RESORT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SQUAW ONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |