USPTO serial 76511381
VERE AUDAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERE AUDAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan D. Rector
SUSAN D RECTOR SCHOTTENSTEIN ZOX & DUNNPO BOX 165020COLUMBUS, OH 43216-5020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS ACQUISITION AND MERGER CONSULTATION, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS CONSULTATION AND BUSINESS PLANNING | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2002 |
| 036 | CAPITAL INVESTMENT CONSULTATION, FACILITATING AND ARRANGING FOR THE FINANCING OF STARTUP AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS, FINANCING SERVICES, FUND INVESTMENT CONSULTATION, INVESTMENT ADVICE, INVESTMENT BROKERAGE, INVESTMENT CONSULTATION, INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, PROVIDING WORKING CAPITAL, REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT AND PROVIDING VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDING SERVICES TO EMERGING, START UP AND EARLY STAGE COMPANIES | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |