USPTO serial 76511464
W.I.T.C.H. WILL IRMA TARANEE CORNELIA HAY LIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with W.I.T.C.H. WILL IRMA TARANEE CORNELIA HAY LIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE ANNE MATHESON
MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated toiletries and cosmetics, namely, hair shampoo; hair conditioner; hair mousse; hair cream rinse; skin cleansing cream; facial, hand, and body cream; facial, hand, and body lotion; facial, hand, and body moisturizer; scalp conditioner; bath oil; bath powder; body powder; perfume; cologne; aftershave; shaving cream and foam; bar soap; liquid soap; skin soap; mascara; lip stick; eyeliner; blush; rouge; eyebrow pencils; nail polish; nail hardener; facial scrubs; facial masks; talcum powder; bubble bath; toilet water; dentrifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Disney Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Disney Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named W.I.T.C.H. WILL IRMA TARANEE CORNELIA HAY LIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |