USPTO serial 76511469
SÃO BRAZ PRODUCTOS DE QUALIDADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SÃO BRAZ PRODUCTOS DE QUALIDADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
Grande, State Paraiba, BR
Other trademarks owned by SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
Grande, State Paraiba, BR
Other trademarks owned by SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
Grande, State Paraiba, BR
Other trademarks owned by SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M. GALGANO
Thomas M. Galgano GALGANO & ASSOCIATES, PLLC20 W. Park Ave., Suite 204Long Beach, NY 11561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CEREAL-NAMELY, CORN FLAKES, AND RICE FLAKES; AND COFFEE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
- Other trademarks owned by SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
- Other trademarks owned by SÃO BRAZ S. A. INDUSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE ALIMENTOS
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SÃO BRAZ PRODUCTOS DE QUALIDADE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |