Drawing for RGM PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 76511572

RGM PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RGM PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terry L. Miller

TERRY L MILLER LAW OFFICES OF TERRY L MILLER24832 VIA SAN FERNANDOMISSION VIEJO, CA 92692-2433UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Nonmetallic roofing materials, particularly-- roofing paper; roll roofing; roof coatings including mastics, and sealants; adhesives for roofing materials; shingles; ridge covers; roof hips; roof panels; ridge ventilators; and roof tilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 26, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance