Drawing for CAROLYN JOHNSON

USPTO serial 76511661

CAROLYN JOHNSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAROLYN JOHNSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Bucher

JEFFREY M BUCHER KOZUSKO LAHEY HARRIS1666 K ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Photographic PrintsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2005PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
May 9, 2005PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 1, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2005PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Jan 20, 2005PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 14, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance