USPTO serial 76511661
CAROLYN JOHNSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAROLYN JOHNSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Bucher
JEFFREY M BUCHER KOZUSKO LAHEY HARRIS1666 K ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Photographic Prints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2005 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |