Drawing for LOL@AOL

USPTO serial 76511691

LOL@AOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOL@AOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Bush

DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING AN INTERACTIVE ONLINE SERVICE FOR CONDUCTING POLLING AND RATING IN THE FIELD OF COMEDYACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING VIDEO AND AUDIO CONTENT AND CABLE AND NETWORK PROGRAMMING IN THE FIELD OF COMEDY VIA COMPUTER NETWORKS; PROVIDING AN INTERACTIVE ONLINE SERVICE THAT ALLOWS USERS TO SUBMIT JOKES; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMEDY VIA COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance