USPTO serial 76511736
SATISFACTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 2009
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SATISFACTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, ANKLET SOCKS, PARKAS, ANORAKS, APRONS, ASCOTS, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, ATHLETIC SHOES, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, BABUSHKAS, BABY BUNTING, SKI BOOT BAGS, BANDANNAS, BANDEAUS, HEAD BANDS, NECK BANDS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING CAPS, BATHROBES, BEACH COVER-UPS, BEACH WEAR, BED JACKETS, CLOTHING BELTS, BERETS, CLOTH BIBS, BIKINIS, BLAZERS, BLOOMERS, BLOUSES, BLOUSONS, BOAS, BODY SHAPERS, BODY SUITS, BOLEROS, BONNETS, BOOTIES, BOOTS, BOTTOMS, BRAS, BRASSIERES, BREECHES, UNDERWEAR BRIEFS, BUSTIERS, CAFTANS, CAMISOLES, CAPES, CLOTHING CAPS, CARDIGANS, CASSOCKS, CHAPS, CHEMISES, CLOGS, COATS, COLLARS, COMPETITOR'S NUMBERS OF TEXTILE, CORSELETS, CORSETS, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES, COVERALLS, COVER-UPS, CRAVATS, CREEPERS, CUFFS, CULOTTES, CUMMERBUNDS, CLOTH DIAPERS, DICKIES, DRESSES, GOWNS, DUNGAREES, DUSTERS, EARMUFFS, ESPADRILLES, FOUL WEATHER GEAR, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, FROCKS, FUR COATS, GABARDINES, GAITERS, GALOSHES, GAUCHOS, FOUNDATION GARMENT GIRDLES, GLOVES, SHIRTS, GREAT COATS SHORTS, GYM SUITS, MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, HALTER TOPS, HATS, HEAD WEAR, HEEL INSERTS, HOODS, HOSIERY, HOUSECOATS, INFANT WEAR, INNERSOLES, HEEL INSERTS AND BLOUSE INSERTS, JACKETS, JEANS, JERSEYS, JODHPURS, JOGGING SUITS, JUMPERS, JUMPSUITS, KERCHIEFS, KILTS, KIMONOS, KNEEHIGHS, KNICKERS, LEG WARMERS, LEGGINGS, LEOTARDS, LINGERIE, LOUNGEWEAR, MAILLOTS, MANTILLAS, MANTLES, MITTENS, MOCCASINS, MUFFLERS, MUFFS, MUKLUKS, MUU MUUS, NECK BANDS, NECKERCHIEFS, NECKTIES, NECKWEAR, NEGLIGEES, OVERALLS, SHOULDER PADS FOR CLOTHING, PAJAMAS, PANTALOONS, PANTIES, PANTS, PANTYHOSE, PAREU, PARKAS, PEDAL PUSHERS, PEIGNOIRS, PINAFORE, POCKET SQUARES, PONCHOS, PULLOVERS, VESTS, RAINWEAR, ROBES, ROMPERS, RUBBERS, SANDALS, SARONGS, SASHES, SCARVES, SHAWLS, SHIFTS, SHOES, SKIRTS, SKI WEAR, SLACKS, SLEEPWEAR, SLIPPERS, SLIPS, SMOCKS, SNEAKERS, SOCKS, INNERSOLES, STOCKINGS, STOLES, SUN VISORS, SUSPENDERS, SWEATBANDS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, TAILLEURS, TANGAS, TANK TOPS, TEDDIES, TENNIS WEAR, THERMAL WEAR, TIES, TIGHTS; TOE BOXES, TOGAS, TOPS, TOQUES, TRACKSUITS, TROUSERS, TUNICS, TURBANS, TUXEDOS, UNDERWEAR, UNIFORMS, UNITARDS, VEILS, VISORS, WRAPS, ZORI | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | BEER, MALT BEER, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEER, COLAS IN THE NATURE OF SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, LEMONADE, MINERAL WATER, SODA WATER, SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA, SPORTS DRINKS AND TABLE WATER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company, K.D. Bruhl Gesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company, K.D. Bruhl Gesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company, K.D. Bruhl Gesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SATISFACTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |