USPTO serial 76511820
DEMAND THE BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEMAND THE BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
Micol Cecchi Nissan North America, Inc.333 Commerce StreetLegal Department, B7-K2Nashville, TN 37201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal gaskets for forklifts, not for motors or engines, sold through applicant's authorized dealers | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Forklift parts and accessories, namely, starters for motors and engines, alternators, radiators for motors and engines, gaskets for motors and engines, oil pumps, cooling fans, spark plugs, all of the foregoing being sold through applicant's authorized dealers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Forklift parts and accessories, namely, torque converters, wheels, brakes, all of the foregoing being sold through applicant's authorized dealers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NISSAN FORKLIFT CORPORATION, NORTH AMERICA
- Other trademarks owned by NISSAN FORKLIFT CORPORATION, NORTH AMERICA
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named DEMAND THE BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 17, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |