USPTO serial 76511960
FILM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3700606Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2009
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FILM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 FOREST HILL DRMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L5M 5A7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Mugs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hats, caps, jackets and T-shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | cafes, providing food and non-alcoholic beverages in cafes; providing of food and non-alcoholic beverages for pick-up | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Film Industry Locations Maintenance Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named FILM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |