Drawing for BLACK FAMILY REUNION TOUR

USPTO serial 76512300

BLACK FAMILY REUNION TOUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLACK FAMILY REUNION TOUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steve H. Clemons

STEVE H. CLEMONS LEGGETT & CLEMONS, PLLC2745 N DALLAS PKWY STE 310PLANO, TX 75093-8729UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting educational conferences in the nature of a national tour themed around creating stronger family values, and including family reunion planning, live musical performances and discussion regarding health educationACTIVEApr 10, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 23, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance