USPTO serial 76512343
DC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. GREENBERG
ROBERT J GREENBERG ROBERT J GREENBERG75-27 171 ST STFRESH MEADOWS, NY 11366-1416UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | 10K, 14K, AND 18K GOLD AND PLATINUM JEWELRY, Namely, BANGLES, BRACELETS, EARRINGS, NECKLACES, PENDANTS AND RINGS; LOOSE DIAMONDS, NAMELY, IN ROUND AND FANCY SHAPES AND CERTIFIED AND NON-CERTIFIED DIAMONDS; AND LOOSE COLORED PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS GEMSTONES | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |