USPTO serial 76512452
NEXT FEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXT FEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric E. Gisolfi
Eric E. Gisolfi SABIN, BERMANT & GOULD LLPFour Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |