USPTO serial 76512711
FEELWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FEELWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, cellular telephones, facsimile machines, telephones; encoded integrated circuits containing computer programming for processing audio, video and/or computer data, namely, for use in playing, recording, and editing sound, audio, video and/or computer data; blank magnetic tapes, optical discs, magnetic discs and magneto-optical discs; pre-recorded audio, video and/or computer data recording media, namely, magnetic tapes, optical discs, magnetic discs, magneto-optical discs, and integrated circuits all featuring music, motion picture films and animation; electronic machines and instruments and their parts and fittings, namely, packaged semi-conductors, audio players and recorders which use integrated circuits as recording media, audio tape players, audio tape recorders, combination audio disc players and recorders, radio tuners, audio receivers, audio amplifiers, audio speakers, headphones, earphones, microphones, televisions, liquid crystal displays, data projectors, video projectors and LCD projectors, television tubes, cathode ray tubes, video tape players/recorders, video disc players/recorders, set stop boxes, namely, computer software and hardware which can convert, supply and transmit audio and video data, personal digital assistants, computers, central processing units, computer disc drives, computer monitors, computer keyboards, computer mice, loudspeakers for computers, computer scanners, computer printers, audio and/or video data processors, robots for entertainment use, integrated circuit chips, data transmission cables, blank magnetic tapes, blank optical discs, blank magnetic discs, blank magneto-optical discs, and blank memory cards; computer software for processing audio, video and/or data, namely, computer application software for use in playing, recording, and editing sound, audio, video and/or computer data; batteries; photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic still cameras; cinematographic apparatus and instruments, namely, video cameras, video cameras combined with video recorders and players; video game players for use with televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | stand alone video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |