Drawing for SCOT

USPTO serial 76512821

SCOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SCOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Bushnell

Robert E. Bushnell Robert E Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street N.W.Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SCIENTIFIC, ELECTRICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, WEIGHING, MEASURING, CHECKING, DIAGNOSTIC AND TESTING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR TESTING PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR TROUBLESHOOTING PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR DIAGNOSING PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, AND TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR DETERMINING RELIABILITY OF PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, SEALS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS; AND SCIENTIFIC, ELECTRICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, WEIGHING, MEASURING, CHECKING, DIAGNOSTIC AND TESTING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR TESTING PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR TROUBLESHOOTING PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS,EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR DIAGNOSING PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, TEST EQUIPMENT, SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF DISCRETE TEST SETS AND SELF-CONTAINED TEST UNITS FOR VERIFYING PERFORMANCE OF PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS FOR VERIFYING PERFORMANCE OF PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, SEALS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, AND TEST EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING RELIABILITY OF PERSONNEL HELMETS, MASKS, EARPHONES, HEADSETS, GOGGLES, FLASHBLINDNESS SHIELDS, ANTI-G GARMENTS, SEALS, CHEMICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT, OXYGEN CONNECTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS IN THE FIELD OF CHEMICALLY CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTSACTIVEDec 31, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 19, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 19, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 22, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 15, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 20, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 20, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 23, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance