USPTO serial 76512851
CERACAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CERACAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOUTH YORKSHIRE S18 1LS, GB
SOUTH YORKSHIRE S18 1LS, GB
SOUTH YORKSHIRE S18 1LS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MANNY D POKOTILOW
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR RIVISE BERNSTEIN COHEN ET AL1635 MARKET ST 12TH FLSEVEN PENN CTRPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CATALYST FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS, OIL PROCESSING AND PETROLEUM CRACKING; CARRIERS MADE OF CERAMIC MATERIALS BEING SUPPORTS FOR CATALYTIC MATERIALS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS, OIL PROCESSING AND PETROLEUM CRACKING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS; REGENERATION OF SPENT CATALYSTS; CHEMICAL PROCESSING OF INDUSTRIAL CATALYSTS TO REMOVE METAL PARTICLES PRIOR TO REUSE; PROCESSING OF USED VEHICLE EXHAUST CATALYSTS FOR THE RECOVERY OF NOBLE METALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | SERVICES IN THE DESIGN AND SELECTION OF CATALYTIC TECHNIQUES AND CATALYSTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dytech Corporation Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dytech Corporation Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dytech Corporation Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CERACAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |