USPTO serial 76512914
AMERICAN MADE FITNESS EQUIPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3009696Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICAN MADE FITNESS EQUIPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL T. EARLE
DANIEL T. EARLE SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 Richmond Highway, Suite 415Alexandria, VA 22303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | FITNESS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LEG PRESSES, LEG EXTENSION/LEG CURL MACHINES, ABDOMINAL AND BACK MACHINES, BICEP/TRICEP MACHINES, UPRIGHT ROW TRICEP PUSHDOWN MACHINES, NAMELY, MACHINES WITH RESISTANCE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS ALLOWING THE USER TO PERFORM AN UPRIGHT ROW EXERCISE IN ONE DIRECTION AND A PUSHDOWN EXERCISE DESIGNED TO WORK THE TRICEP MUSCLES IN THE OTHER DIRECTION, DEADLIFT MACHINES, NAMELY, A WORKOUT MACHINE DESIGNED TO SIMULATE THE DEADLIFT EXERCISE, INNER/OUTER THIGH MACHINES, SQUAT MACHINES, CHEST PRESS ROWS, NAMELY CHEST PRESS MACHINES WITH RESISTANCE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS TO ALLOW THE USER TO EXERCISE WHILE PUSHING OUT AND PULLING BACK, ROTARY TORSO MACHINES, SHOULDER PRESS/PULL MACHINES, PECTORAL/DELTOID MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 11, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |