USPTO serial 76513050
FRESH, FLAVORFUL AND FAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRESH, FLAVORFUL AND FAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Kirsch
KEVIN W KIRSCH STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH660 NEWPORT CTR DR STE 1600NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6458UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chicken; turkey; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat; prepared meals consisting primarily of poultry; prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables; garden salads; soups; prepared vegetables, namely, cut fresh vegetables; vegetable salad; prepared fruit, namely, cut fruit | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | sandwiches; prepared meals consisting primarily of rice; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta; tortillas; tortilla wrapped sandwiches; pasta salads; prepared stuffing; pot pies; cookies; brownies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | restaurant services, take-out restaurant services and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BANK ONE, NA
- Other trademarks owned by MAGIC RESTAURANTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KOO KOO ROO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRESH, FLAVORFUL AND FAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |