USPTO serial 76513062
CONVERSION COUNTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3134443Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONVERSION COUNTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura H. Covington, Esq.
LAURA H COVINGTON ESQ LEGAL DEPTYAHOO! INC701 1ST AVESUNNYVALE, CA 94089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for tracking and analyzing the performance of online advertising | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 17, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |