USPTO serial 76513228
504 FLAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 504 FLAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BIRMINGHAM, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAVEEDA MORGAN BATTLE
LAVEEDA MORGAN BATTLE EMOND VINES GORHAM & WALDREP PC2101 SIXTH AVE N STE 700BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts; jerseys; uniforms; pants; trousers; jeans; overalls; coveralls; jumpers; jump suits; shorts; tops; sweat pants; wraps; warm-up suits; jogging suits; skirts; dresses; sweaters; vests; pullovers; snow suits; parkas; jackets; coats; blazers; suits; swim wear; beachwear; wrist bands; sweat bands; headwear; ear muffs; aprons; scarves; bandanas; belts; suspenders; neckwear; underwear; singlets; socks; loungewear; robes; underclothes; sleepwear; lingerie; leg warmers; leggings; tights; leotards; unitards; gloves; mittens; footwear; rainwear | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |