Drawing for MYRTLE BEACH LIFEGUARD

USPTO serial 76513323

MYRTLE BEACH LIFEGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYRTLE BEACH LIFEGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ezra Sutton

EZRA SUTTON EZRA SUTTON, PAPLZ 9 900 RT 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, JACKETS, HATS, BATHING SUITS, ROBES, SLIPPERS, SANDALS, WRAPS, and UNDERWEARABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance