USPTO serial 76513336
SPRING BERRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPRING BERRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Denk
PAUL M DENK763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141-8704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | air freshener that applies directly onto an air vent register | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |