Drawing for WILDFLOWER MIST

USPTO serial 76513337

WILDFLOWER MIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILDFLOWER MIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul M. Denk

PAUL M DENK763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141-8704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005air freshener that applies directly onto an air vent registerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 9, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 6, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 17, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance