USPTO serial 76513634
Serial No. 76513634
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76513634?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pizza, Pizza Crust, Pizza Dough, Cake, Pie, Cracker, Cracker Cheese Combination, Hamburger Sandwiches, Sandwiches | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |