USPTO serial 76514181
NEX FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEX FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G8, CA
Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G8, CA
Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G8, CA
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn K. Robbins II
GLENN K. ROBBINS II SPENCER FANE BRITT & BROWNE1 NORTH BRENTWOOD BLVD.SUITE 1000ST. LOUIS, MO 63105-3925Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Compressed air-operated components for use in conveying, namely in-line air vacuum conveyors for industrial applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Compressed air-operated components for use in industrial and commercial cooling, blow-off and ventilating, namely air knives, air amplifiers, vortex tubes, cabinet coolers, tool coolers, needle chillers, air ionizes, air jets and air nozzles and replacement parts therefore | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nex Flow International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nex Flow International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nex Flow International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 537397 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named NEX FLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |