USPTO serial 76514508
ROTOMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROTOMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HAMILTON, ONTARIO L8M 1L9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Koch
MARK A KOCH866 MAIN ST EHAMILTON, ON L8M 1L9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drill attachments, drill driver attachments, bit holders, drill drivers, all for use with power tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |