USPTO serial 76514634
VISOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Heinze
Christie Baty Heinze FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints, namely, house paint and furniture paint; varnishes; lacquers in the nature of a coating; preservatives against rust in the nature of a coating; preservatives against deterioration of wood in the nature of impregnation wood preservatives; colorants for use in the manufacture of impregnation wood preservatives; colorants for use in the manufacture of paint; colorants for use in the manufacture of paint for wood; mordants for use on wood; preservatives for wood; oils for preserving wood; and wood impregnation preservatives | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, building panels in the nature of ceiling panels, floor panels, and furniture panels; non-metal planks for building; non-metal rigid pipes for building; framework, namely, door frames and window frames for building; non-metal facade cladding for construction and building; non-metal window joinery for building; wood paneling for building; non-metallic floors; parquet wood flooring; roofing underlayment and non-metal roofing boards; wood poles; and semi-worked wood, namely, millwork, molding, and flooring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chemblock Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chemblock Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named VISOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |