USPTO serial 76514668
CLUB GIGANTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLUB GIGANTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. G. Lockwood
ROBERT H. G. LOCKWOOD SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1230 PEACHTREE STREET NESUITE 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Membership club services, namely, online computer and mail order services featuring music audio discs, tapes and cassettes and video discs and tapes | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, ongoing television programs featuring variety shows, skits, magic, dance, comedy routines, musical performances by individuals, groups, and bands, parodies, humor, monologues, voice imitations, interviews, and talk shows | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |