Drawing for TAILWIND VOICE & DATA

USPTO serial 76514690

TAILWIND VOICE & DATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAILWIND VOICE & DATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann Dunn Wessberg

ANN DUNN WESSBERG FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WLS FARGO CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Coordinating office telecommunications systems, namely, selling voice and data systems and coordinating the installation, relocation, maintenance and servicing of voice and data systemsACTIVEJul 9, 2003
038Telecommunications services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, and graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable and satellite transmissionsACTIVEJul 9, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 15, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 4, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 24, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 29, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 20, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance