USPTO serial 76514704
EXPEDITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPEDITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B - 2640 Mortsel, BE
B - 2640 Mortsel, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE A. BREINER
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.PO BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Film handling and processing apparatus, intensifying screens for use in combination with radiographic films, radiographic film cassettes, film identification cameras for radiographic film; apparatus for photographic and radiographic applications comprising processing apparatus, mixers of chemicals, exposure apparatus, film-handling systems, identification cameras, video imagers and printers; computer hardware, software and peripherals for use in the field of radiography; computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer software for storing, processing, managing and transmitting images in the field of healthcare; computer software for logging of data on computers and computer peripherals; computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer software for storing, processing, managing and transmitting medical diagnostic images; computer software for logging of medical data on computers and computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND DENTAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING MACHINES AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS AND FILM CASSETTES; PRINTERS FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |