USPTO serial 76514774
N NORINCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N NORINCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Boney Denison
MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Firearms, carbines, rifles, ammunition, bandoleers for weapons, hunting firearms, guns, sighting mirrors for guns and rifles, lead shot for hunting, machine guns, pistols, air pistols, muffle for guns, safety fuse | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2005 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |