USPTO serial 76514818
A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3113382Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Krizman
1930 East Marlton Pike Ste. QCherry Hill, NJ 08003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, HOME LOCATOR SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1996 |
| 039 | MOVING VAN SERVICES, NAMELY, MOVING VAN SERVICES FOR SENIOR CITIZENS; TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING, PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT LOCAL UTILITY SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1996 |
| 041 | PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING SCHOOL PROFILES IN SPECIFIC COMMUNITIES FOR POTENTIAL HOME PURCHASERS, PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT LOCAL RECREATION FACILITIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |