Drawing for CAPEXCEL

USPTO serial 76514933

CAPEXCEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPEXCEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill S. Riola

Jill Sarnoff Riola Carlton Fields450 S. Orange Ave.Orlando, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic procurement systems and electronic commerce systems to enable customers to obtain a broad assortment of materials and services, comprised of computer hardware and computer softwareACTIVE—
035wholesale distributorships featuring electronic procurement systems for use in obtaining a broad assortment of materials and services; business consultation in the field of electronic procurement and electronic commerce; business services, namely, setting up and operation of electronic procurement services and electronic commerce systems for othersACTIVE—
042providing customers with technical consultations in electronic procurement systems to obtain a broad assortment of materials and services; providing technical consultations in the field of electronic procurement and electronic commerce; providing technical assistance in setting up and operation of electronic procurement services and electronic commerce systems for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance