USPTO serial 76515140
EAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Luis Obispo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN M CHANLEY
STEVEN M CHANLEY EAG LC1194 PACIFIC ST STE 100SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Legal Services | ACTIVE | Feb 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |