USPTO serial 76515388
THE CHICAGO SOLAR PARTNERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2943155Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE CHICAGO SOLAR PARTNERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn E. Rzonca
Lynn E. Rzonca BALLARD SPAHR LLP1735 MARKET STREET, 51ST FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | providing information regarding the distribution of renewable energy, including solar power, via a global computer network and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 040 | providing information regarding the generation or production of renewable energy, including solar power, via a global computer network and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 041 | providing educational services, namely, providing course materials in the field of generation, production, and distribution of renewal energy, including solar power, via a global computer network and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE CHICAGO SOLAR PARTNERSHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 7, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |