USPTO serial 76515390
THE CHICAGO SOLAR PARTNERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2965635Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2005
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE CHICAGO SOLAR PARTNERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn E. Rzonca
Lynn E. Rzonca BALLARD SPAHR LLP1735 MARKET STREET, 51ST FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | providing information regarding the distribution of renewable energy, including solar power, via a global computer network and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 040 | Providing information regarding the generation or production of renewable energy, including solar power, via a global computer network and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 041 | Providing educational services, namely, providing course materials in the field of generation, production, and distribution of renewal energy, including solar power, via a global computer network and other media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE CHICAGO SOLAR PARTNERSHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |