USPTO serial 76515521
WEBKINZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBKINZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3T2, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3T2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank H. Andorka
MELANIE S CORCORAN BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CALCULATORS, VIDEO DISCS, VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES, VIDEO GAME DISCS, VIDEO GAMES INTERACTIVE CONTROL FLOOR PADS OR MATS, VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE REMOTE CONTROL UNITS, VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE HAND HELD REMOTE CONTROLS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, VIDEO GAME JOYSTICKS, VIDEO GAMES SOFTWARE, VIDEO RECORDINGS, CONTAINING STORES INVOLVING ANIMATED AND/OR LIVE ACTION CHARACTERS, VIDEO TAPES CONTAINING STORIES INVOLVING ANIMATED AND/OR LIVE ACTION CHARACTERS; EYEGLASSES AND EYEGLASS CASES; COMPUTER SCREEN SAVERS; COMPUTER MOUSE PADS; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SOFTWARE FOR CREATING ANIMATED SCREEN SAVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |